Mr. John Lujan, Superintendent
Guadalupe Mountains National Park
400 Pine Springs Canyon Road
Salt Flat, TX 79847-9400
Dear Superintendent Lujan:
Please accept this letter as a comment on the Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (GMP) for Guadalupe Mountains National Park (GMNP) released this spring by the National Park Service. I understand that the GMP will guide the actions of the National Park Service (NPS) with regard to Guadalupe Mountains National Park for a 15 to 20 year period.
I support Alternative B as the management approach for Guadalupe
Mountains National Park because it emphasizes protection
of the wilderness and wildlife values of the Park. I recommend,
however, the following additions or modifications to Alternative
B, in order to achieve the full protection of the Park’s
wilderness and wildlife resources:
1) Wilderness eligibility and designation for 38,134 acres instead of the proposed 35,487 acres.
2) Reduction in, but not elimination of, horse use (day use only) on trails in GMNP by some percentage (perhaps 20-50%) to reduce environmental impacts on geological, biological, and ecological resources and conflicts with hikers. There should be no horse concession for the Park.
3) The proposed boundary adjustment and acquisition of additional lands in Patterson Hills, Salt Basin and Flats, Guadalupe Pass area, Delaware Mountains, Guadalupe Escarpment, and other sensitive areas to protect the GMNP view-shed; acquire important geological and ecological areas; and to buffer GMNP from present and future development pressures and allow plant and animals adaptation to climate change. The NPS should acquire the 10,000 acres of land adjoining GMNP that has just been put up for sale.
4) Employment of at least 40 people and rejection of the downgrading of employee numbers to a core of 34.
5) An aggressive push by NPS to get state and federal officials
to address the deterioration of scenic views due to regional
haze air pollution sooner than the mandated 2064 deadline.
Air Quality as an “impact topic” should not be dismissed
from further consideration in the GMP and should be fully
analyzed, assessed, and evaluated for all alternatives including
the effects and mitigation of climate change due to greenhouse
gas emissions.
6) Retention and possible expansion of the Pine Springs tent camping area and the movement of the RV camping area so it is separated from the Pine Springs tent camping area.
7) A new consolidated park headquarters and office complex and cultural museum south of U.S. Highway 62/180 close to the maintenance area.
8) Full implementation of the Wilderness Act and protection of wilderness character versus protection of human installations and structures and other human actions in wilderness management.
9) Provision of a shuttle system for trails to reduce driving and parking impacts.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important management plan for Guadalupe Mountains National Park.
